<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Backups on Apuntes de root</title>
    <link>https://blog.099c.org/tags/backups/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Backups on Apuntes de root</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>jorti@pm.me (Juan Orti Alcaine)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>jorti@pm.me (Juan Orti Alcaine)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 10:28:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.099c.org/tags/backups/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Vykar backup tool</title>
      <link>https://blog.099c.org/posts/vykar-backup-tool/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 10:28:33 +0100</pubDate><author>jorti@pm.me (Juan Orti Alcaine)</author>
      <guid>https://blog.099c.org/posts/vykar-backup-tool/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.borgbackup.org/&#34;&gt;Borg backup&lt;/a&gt; for many years for my backups and I&amp;rsquo;m pretty happy with it,&#xA;but today a new alternative has been published: &lt;a href=&#34;https://vykar.borgbase.com/&#34;&gt;Vykar backup&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The tool is still new and not ready for production, however the benchmarks they published&#xA;look very promising. Also, it supports object storage backends, which is something that Borg&#xA;has been promising for years, but it&amp;rsquo;s still in the roadmap.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I will definitely keep track of its progress as it might be a good alternative in the future.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
